Adaptive Merging of Prioritized Knowledge Bases
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we propose an adaptive algorithm for merging n (n≥2) prioritized knowledge bases which takes into account the degrees of conflict and agreement among these knowledge bases. The algorithm first selects largely partially maximal consistent subsets (LPMCS) of sources by assessing how (partially) consistent the information in the subset is. Then within each of these created subsets, a maximal consistent subset is further selected and knowledge bases in it are merged with a suitable conjunctive operator based on the degree of agreement among them. This result is then merged with the remaining knowledge bases in the corresponding LPMCS in the second step through the relaxation of the minimum operator. Finally, the knowledge bases obtained from the second step are merged by a maximum operator. In comparison with other merging methods, our approach is more context dependent and is especially useful when most sources of information are in conflict.
منابع مشابه
The Non-archimedean Polynomials and Merging of Stratified Knowledge Bases
In this paper, a new algebraic representation by the non-Archimedean fields is proposed to model stratified/ranked knowledge bases. The non-Archimedean representation is in the form of the non-Archimedean polynomials. With the nonArchimedean representation, the most widely used ordering strategies are easily induced and compared. Moreover, a framework of prioritized merging operators using the ...
متن کاملA Model-based Approach for Merging Prioritized Knowledge Bases in Possibilistic Logic
This paper presents a new approach for merging prioritized knowledge bases in possibilistic logic. Our approach is semantically defined by a model-based merging operator in propositional logic and the merged result of our approach is a normal possibility distribution. We also give an algorithm to obtain the syntactical counterpart of the semantic approach. The logical properties of our approach...
متن کاملAn Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case
An important problem in the management of knowledge-based systems is the handling of inconsistency. Inconsistency may appear because the knowledge may come from different sources of information. To solve this problem, two kinds of approaches have been proposed. The first category merges the different bases into a unique base, and the second category of approaches, such as argumentation, accepts...
متن کاملMin-based Assertional Merging Approach for Prioritized DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
DL-Lite is a powerful and tractable family of description logics specifically tailored for applications that use huge volumes of data. In many real world applications, data are often provided by several and potentially conflicting sources of information having different levels of priority. Possibility theory offers a very natural framework to deal with ordinal and qualitative uncertain beliefs ...
متن کاملCombining multiple prioritized knowledge bases by negotiation
Recently, several belief negotiation models have been introduced to deal with the problem of belief merging. A negotiation model usually consists of two functions: a negotiation function and a weakening function. A negotiation function is defined to choose the weakest sources and these sources will weaken their point of view using a weakening function. However, the currently available belief ne...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Fundam. Inform.
دوره 73 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006